Skip to main content

CPF Contribution Rates for new Singapore Permanent Residents (SPR’s)

Recently my wife and I applied and got approved for Singapore Permanent Residency. After completing the formalities the most significant immediate change is the contribution to CPF which is Singapore’s mandatory social security savings scheme requiring contributions from employers and employees. CPF contributions start from the date you obtain SPR status, which is the date of the entry permit.  

Being a relentless budgeter I needed to know exactly how much I and my employer would have to contribute so that I could adjust my budget accordingly as the employee contributions get deducted from the monthly salary.

After doing some research I discovered that there is a “graduated” approach to CPF contributions for new SPR’s where the contributions gradually increase in the first and second year and then upon reaching the third year are at the full amount.

Note: There is an option for employers to contribute the full amount for year 1 and year 2 and the employee can use the graduated rate, but obviously this has to be negotiated with your employer and good luck trying to win that one.

Now whilst it’s true that the contributions rates are a percentage (37%) of your salary the key factor here is that it is capped at a maximum salary. For example if you earn 10k a month, your contribution is calculated on the first $6k of ordinary income.

The CPF website is quite overwhelming with information, but after playing with the CPF calculators for a while I was able to clarify exactly what the contributions were year by year. 

Monthly CPF Contributions

  Year 1 Year 2 Year 3+
Employee

$300

$900

$1200

Employer

$240

$540

$1020

Total

$540

$1440

$2220

Note: Assumes salary > 6k and age < 55 and only applies to Ordinary Wages.

References

Contribution Calculator for 1st and 2nd year SPR’s

Contribution Calculator for 3rd year SPR’s

Popular posts from this blog

Freeing Disk Space on C:\ Windows Server 2008

  I just spent the last little while trying to clear space on our servers in order to install .NET 4.5 . Decided to post so my future self can find the information when I next have to do this. I performed all the usual tasks: Deleting any files/folders from C:\windows\temp and C:\Users\%UserName%\AppData\Local\Temp Delete all EventViewer logs Save to another Disk if you want to keep them Remove any unused programs, e.g. Firefox Remove anything in C:\inetpub\logs Remove any file/folders C:\Windows\System32\LogFiles Remove any file/folders from C:\Users\%UserName%\Downloads Remove any file/folders able to be removed from C:\Users\%UserName%\Desktop Remove any file/folders able to be removed from C:\Users\%UserName%\My Documents Stop Windows Update service and remove all files/folders from C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution Deleting an Event Logs Run COMPCLN.exe Move the Virtual Memory file to another disk However this wasn’t enough & I found the most space was

3 Reasons Why Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) Won’t Replace Native Apps

Many people believe Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are the future of the mobile web, but in my opinion, PWAs are not a replacement for native mobile apps. Here are three reasons why: 1. Native mobile apps provide a smoother & faster experience  Mobile websites, progressive or otherwise are slower and not as smooth. 90% of the time spent is spent using apps vs the browser . The single most significant contributing factor to a smooth experience on mobile is the speed of the network and latency of the data downloaded and uploaded. When you visit websites on desktop or mobile, there is a lot of third-party code/data that gets downloaded to your device, which more often than not has zero impact on the user experience. This includes: CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) JavaScript Ad network code Facebook tracking code Google tracking code The median number of requests a mobile website makes is a shocking  69 . On the other hand, native apps only get the data that is requi

Unit Testing Workflow Activities in .NET 4.0

  Recently during a catch up with my buddy Keith Patton I was (as I tend to do) singing the praises of the Workflow in .NET 4.0. The all important question about Unit Testing support was raised, I tried as best as I could to explain the new In and Out Arguments but I didn’t feel I was convincing enough, so I though I would clarify with a blog post. If you developed Workflows in .NET 3.5 then you will be well aware of the lack of Unit Test support which was due to many reasons but mostly in part to the complex Workflow hosting environment. When moving to .NET 4.0 Workflow Foundation from .NET 3.5 it pays to be conscious of that fact that there is no longer a distinction between Activities and Workflows. Everything derives from the System.Activities.Activity class. So the definition of a Workflow is just a collection of of 1 or more Activities. I have designed a very simple Rental Car Activity which takes the an Applicants age as the input and outputs a True or False depending o