Skip to main content

GoGrid vs Amazon EC2 - Cloud Hosting Continued

So I've just completed deploying an application to my first GoGrid server, this is the same application as what I've previously deployed to my Amazon EC2 instance.
As I mentioned before the application is an ASP.NET MVC front-end with supporting WCF services running on against a Sql Server Express 2008 Database.  
Because I run a Vista development machine I was aware of the fact that running .NET MVC on IIS7.0 outperforms II6.0 with the wildcard ISAPI filter which is what I had to resort to when using my EC2 instance. What I didn't know was by just how much. 
On a general note the overall learning curve and time taken to setup the server and then deploy the application was far less than with Amazon EC2. So full credit to Go Grid for the intuitive user interface.
Also not having to concern myself with Elastic Block Stores and tracking down the Windows Server Install Disc Snapsh0t to install FTP server was a great help and thing's which have been made unnecessarily painful with Amazon EC2.
So just to give you some background on the machine specs 
Amazon EC2 
Windows Server 2003 32bit
Ram 1.66GB
2.71 GHZ 
Sql Server Express 2008
Windows Server 2008 64bit
1GB Ram 
.NET 3.5 SP1
Sql Server Express 2008
So once I had deployed my app on GoGrid I decided to do some basic performance testing on one of the key pages in our application. 
The page in question navigates a tree. 
So you click on a Node and then the page reloads with the Child Nodes contained in the Parent Node. Essentially like navigating a folder structure except that Child Nodes which aren't containers can be different types Images, Videos etc. Pagination is also included. 
The page is loaded and refreshed by making a jQuery $ajax Get Request to a Controller Action which renders the Html using the standard aspx template engine and then writes the result html into a div. 
The html size that is load is approximately 20kb with an additional 8kb of images. 
so here are the results as taken from Firebug console, time in milliseconds.
Avg: 218 Avg: 308
Overall there is quite a big difference 30% in my very basic anaylsis. 
But GoGrid responding 30% faster is definetly enough for me to revaluate my hosting options. 
The overall offering from Amazon is certainly great and because of my Video, Image content requirements approx 1TB. 
If they were offer Windows Server 2008 images then I think that would solve the problem. 
So the conclusion I have come to for the optimal cloud hosting setup is this. 
S3 Storage for all Media files
N x Amazon EC2 Instances for Media Transcoding
Amazon CloudFront for Content Delivery Network 
N x GoGrid Windows Server 2008 for the application 
GoGrid Dedicated Sql Server 2005 for database.  (or 2008 when they offer that) 
GoGrid Load Balancer. 
Now the next challenge will be trying to migrate 1TB of Media Content from my server into Amazon S3 cheaply and effeciently. Would love to hear if anyone has any ideas.

Popular posts from this blog

Freeing Disk Space on C:\ Windows Server 2008

  I just spent the last little while trying to clear space on our servers in order to install .NET 4.5 . Decided to post so my future self can find the information when I next have to do this. I performed all the usual tasks: Deleting any files/folders from C:\windows\temp and C:\Users\%UserName%\AppData\Local\Temp Delete all EventViewer logs Save to another Disk if you want to keep them Remove any unused programs, e.g. Firefox Remove anything in C:\inetpub\logs Remove any file/folders C:\Windows\System32\LogFiles Remove any file/folders from C:\Users\%UserName%\Downloads Remove any file/folders able to be removed from C:\Users\%UserName%\Desktop Remove any file/folders able to be removed from C:\Users\%UserName%\My Documents Stop Windows Update service and remove all files/folders from C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution Deleting an Event Logs Run COMPCLN.exe Move the Virtual Memory file to another disk However this wasn’t enough & I found the most space was

3 Reasons Why Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) Won’t Replace Native Apps

Many people believe Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are the future of the mobile web, but in my opinion, PWAs are not a replacement for native mobile apps. Here are three reasons why: 1. Native mobile apps provide a smoother & faster experience  Mobile websites, progressive or otherwise are slower and not as smooth. 90% of the time spent is spent using apps vs the browser . The single most significant contributing factor to a smooth experience on mobile is the speed of the network and latency of the data downloaded and uploaded. When you visit websites on desktop or mobile, there is a lot of third-party code/data that gets downloaded to your device, which more often than not has zero impact on the user experience. This includes: CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) JavaScript Ad network code Facebook tracking code Google tracking code The median number of requests a mobile website makes is a shocking  69 . On the other hand, native apps only get the data that is requi

Unit Testing Workflow Activities in .NET 4.0

  Recently during a catch up with my buddy Keith Patton I was (as I tend to do) singing the praises of the Workflow in .NET 4.0. The all important question about Unit Testing support was raised, I tried as best as I could to explain the new In and Out Arguments but I didn’t feel I was convincing enough, so I though I would clarify with a blog post. If you developed Workflows in .NET 3.5 then you will be well aware of the lack of Unit Test support which was due to many reasons but mostly in part to the complex Workflow hosting environment. When moving to .NET 4.0 Workflow Foundation from .NET 3.5 it pays to be conscious of that fact that there is no longer a distinction between Activities and Workflows. Everything derives from the System.Activities.Activity class. So the definition of a Workflow is just a collection of of 1 or more Activities. I have designed a very simple Rental Car Activity which takes the an Applicants age as the input and outputs a True or False depending o